fjcouglhin

CALIFORNIA APPEAL – How the denial of a (non-appealable) motion for non-suit can still be argued on appeal

A party who prevailed at trial is generally not aggrieved by the judgment and should not file an appeal or cross-appeal.  Moreover, the trial court’s ruling on a motion for non-suit is not an appealable order. In its appellate briefing, a responding party who did not prevail in a motion for nonsuit at trial can […]

CALIFORNIA APPEAL – How the denial of a (non-appealable) motion for non-suit can still be argued on appeal Read More »

CAL CIV PRO — DISCOVERY AND FINANCIAL PRIVACY

The two truisms of taking discovery of the other party’s private financial information: Relevance alone is not enough to compel disclosure; and, courts must engage in balancing in deciding what financial discovery to allow. “[W]hen a discovery request seeks information implicating the constitutional right of privacy, to order discovery simply upon a showing that the

CAL CIV PRO — DISCOVERY AND FINANCIAL PRIVACY Read More »

FAA – FAA INCLUDES LIMITED EXCEPTION FOR TRANSPORTATION WORKERS

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) governs arbitration in written contracts involving interstate commerce. The party asserting FAA preemption has the burden to present evidence establishing a contract affecting interstate commerce.  However, Section 1 of the FAA provides a limited exemption from the law’s coverage to “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other

FAA – FAA INCLUDES LIMITED EXCEPTION FOR TRANSPORTATION WORKERS Read More »

CAL CCP 474 — THE DOE AMENDMENT AND RELATION BACK FOR PURPOSES OF SOL

California law allows lawsuits against unnamed defendants (the “John Doe” or “Doe” defendant) if the plaintiff doesn’t know the real defendant’s identity when the lawsuit is originally filed. Once the identity is discovered, the lawsuit can be amended to include the real name, and this amendment relates back to the original filing date.  The question

CAL CCP 474 — THE DOE AMENDMENT AND RELATION BACK FOR PURPOSES OF SOL Read More »

ARBITRATION — THE RIGHT OF NON-SIGNATORIES TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

A lawsuit is often brought against a primary defendant, but names other defendants who may be vicariously liable on theories like agency or conspiracy.  If the primary defendant signed an arbitration agreement and has the right to compel arbitration, the non-signatories may have a similar right.  JSM Tuscany, LLC v. Superior Court (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1222,

ARBITRATION — THE RIGHT OF NON-SIGNATORIES TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Read More »